Choose suitable learning
Learners can compare the course subject, intended outcomes, learning time and completion requirements with their own development needs before enrolling.
Understand CPD certificatesCPD accreditation gives training providers an external review of their course and helps learners and employers understand what has been assessed. Its practical value comes from relevant learning, useful feedback and an approval that can be checked.

A provider knows its course well, but an external reviewer can ask questions that are easy to overlook during development. Do the materials cover the advertised outcomes? Is the learning time realistic? Does the completion activity check what the course promises to teach?
Our course accreditation considers those questions against the submitted material. The benefit is an opportunity to address gaps and establish exactly which course version and scope have been reviewed.
Accreditation supports the learning offer, but it cannot make an unsuitable course relevant to every learner. Choosing the right subject and level, and checking any professional CPD requirements, remain part of the decision.
Each audience uses accreditation differently: to choose training, prepare a course for delivery or support a workplace development plan.
Learners can compare the course subject, intended outcomes, learning time and completion requirements with their own development needs before enrolling.
Understand CPD certificatesProviders receive an external review of the submitted course. Findings can identify missing material, unsupported time claims or completion checks that need attention.
Explore course accreditationEmployers can use the course information and completion evidence when discussing training needs, reviewing learning and planning opportunities to apply it at work.
Learn how CPD works
Consider a workshop that promises learners will practise a technique, but includes only presentation slides. A review can identify the missing practice activity and ask how the provider will establish that the intended outcome has been met.
Similarly, a three-hour event with a half-hour break does not contain three hours of active learning. Checking the timetable alongside the materials helps the provider describe the course duration accurately.
These are illustrative examples, not findings about a particular provider. In an actual review, questions and required changes relate to the submitted evidence. Our evidence guidance helps applicants prepare the material needed to answer them.
See the review processAccreditation concerns the course. The learner and employer still have a part to play in making the learning useful after completion.

Before learning: identify a task, knowledge gap or change in responsibility, then choose a course with outcomes that match it.

After learning: use the new knowledge in an appropriate setting and seek feedback on what improved or still needs practice.
At review: record the activity, retain completion evidence and explain how the learning affected your work or your next development goal.
An approval reference lets a provider connect its course description to a published record. Prospective learners or clients can check the named course and its approval details instead of relying on a logo alone.
This is useful on course pages, proposals and learner information. State which activity is accredited, describe its outcomes and direct readers to the course directory or verification service. Approval marks should follow the scope and conditions of the record.
Accreditation does not guarantee more sales or universal recognition. The provider still needs appropriate teaching, learner support and an honest description of what the course offers. Organisational controls can be considered separately through provider approval.
Read the logo use guidelines
A CPD certificate identifies the activity completed. Alongside a short reflection and examples of subsequent work, it can support an appraisal, learning portfolio or conversation with a manager.
For example, after a course on presenting information, a learner might retain the certificate and a revised presentation, then note feedback from their next meeting. That gives a development discussion more substance than the attendance record alone.
Employers can use the discussion to agree further practice, support or training. Completion alone does not prove occupational competence, guarantee promotion or grant permission to work in a regulated role.
Compare CPD with regulated qualifications
Specialist learning needs scrutiny from people with an appropriate background. A reviewer needs to understand the intended audience, recognise where technical evidence is needed and explain findings that the provider can act on.
Our assessor approval route checks qualifications and professional experience for a defined subject scope. This helps us consider suitable expertise when a course needs review, rather than treating assessor approval as permission to assess every subject.
For experienced professionals, the route offers a way to put that background forward for verification and potential assessment work. Applications are free; selection for paid assignments depends on relevant work being available.
See the assessor routeWhat accreditation can contribute, how to choose useful learning and where its limits apply.
It gives a provider an external assessment of a named course and its supporting evidence. The review can identify issues before approval and establishes the scope of the resulting accreditation. Its value depends on the learning itself and how it is used.
It helps learners understand what was reviewed and gives them a clearer record of the activity they completed. Acceptance still depends on the rules of their employer, regulator or professional body.
The review can identify gaps in learning outcomes, source control, course timing, completion checks and certificate wording before the course is promoted as approved CPD.
No. Employers, regulators and professional bodies set their own CPD rules. Learners should confirm whether a particular activity, subject or evidence format will meet the requirement that applies to them.
No. CPD records continuing professional development. Accreditation does not award a regulated qualification, an RQF level, academic credit, professional registration or a licence to practise.
No. A verifiable approval can help explain what has been reviewed, but it does not guarantee enrolments, employment or promotion. Subject relevance, teaching, learner support and the ability to apply learning remain important.
Compare its outcomes, level, delivery method and completion requirements with your learning goal. Check any professional requirements before enrolling, then plan how you will apply the learning and record what changed.
No. Provider approval reviews the organisation and its training controls. A named course needs a separate course review when its materials, CPD hours, course approval mark and certificate wording require accreditation.